MyBlog

New Yorker: When Effort Trumps Ability

Malcolm Gladwell’s piece in the latest New Yorker focuses on how an inferior girls’ basketball team was able to work harder than its more talented counterparts and win. He explains how other underdogs in history were able to triumph using an “insurgent” strategy, but why the conventional route to success is the more well-worn path. From the piece, Gladwell notes how the Davids overcome the Goliaths:

This is the second half of the insurgent’s creed. Insurgents work harder than Goliath. But their other advantage is that they will do what is “socially horrifying”—they will challenge the conventions about how battles are supposed to be fought. All the things that distinguish the ideal basketball player are acts of skill and coördination. When the game becomes about effort over ability, it becomes unrecognizable—a shocking mixture of broken plays and flailing limbs and usually competent players panicking and throwing the ball out of bounds. You have to be outside the establishment—a foreigner new to the game or a skinny kid from New York at the end of the bench—to have the audacity to play it that way. George Washington couldn’t do it. His dream, before the war, was to be a British Army officer, finely turned out in a red coat and brass buttons. He found the guerrillas who had served the American Revolution so well to be “an exceeding dirty and nasty people.” He couldn’t fight the establishment, because he was the establishment.

Subscribe to the New Yorker here.

Watch: Senate Hearing on the Future of Journalism

Update, 12:13 a.m. Very thoughtful discussion. Kerry asks a crucial question around minute 180: Essentially, what type of antitrust (temporary) legislative/regulatory fix could the aggregators (Google/Huffington) live with so that newspapers could sit down, en masse, and work out a deal so that everyone wins?  (photo credit New Yorker; Steve Coll’s blog about his experience testifying.)

Update, 11:26 p.m. EST: If you don’t have time to listen to the whole thing (!), an interesting discussion breaks out around minutes 135-150 and on after that. Did I hear a politician complaining that the demise of local reporting might mean her peers (or her) won’t be investigated and watched? And that she’s worried about that? This could be the last time you hear that said in public.   

Update, 10: 45 p.m. EST:  The webcast is archived here. What do you think? In this era of the 30-second sound bite, this sucker went on for nearly four hours. I know this was about the future of journalism, but I must say I feel bad for the gals and guys who had to report on this hearing. It’s almost like having to serve drinks at your own wake.

Update, 6:00 p.m. EST:  I was going to try to post the full video and noticed the hearing is still going on. I will try to find a link to the full question-and-answer session later. 

The live webcast is accessible here. (2:45 p.m.)

Witnesses and links to testimony:

Opening Remarks

Panel 1

Senator Ben Cardin Senator United States Senate

Panel 2

Marissa Mayer
Vice President, Search Products & User Experience Google Inc.
Alberto Ibargüen
President and Chief Executive Officer John S. And James L. Knight Foundation
David Simon
Author, TV Producer and Former Newspaperman
Steve Coll
Former Managing Editor The Washington Post
James Moroney
Publisher/CEO The Dallas Morning News
Arianna Huffington
Co-founder and Editor-in-Chief The Huffington Post

Frank Partnoy: “The Match King”

On the Diane Rehm Show (WAMU 88.5 in Washington) today, the guest is Frank Partnoy talking about his new book, "The Match King," the state of the housing market, and other things "Great Recession"-related.

[audio: "http://wamu.org/audio/dr/09/05/r2090504-24680.asx"]

Partnoy is extremely insightful about the economy and, having worked in the Wall Street belly of the beast, knows of what he speaks.

Here’s  a conversation he had in March with Terry Gross, of Fresh Air (WHYY in Philadelphia), on "Derivative Dangers." If you want a very good primer on the topic, spelled out in layman’s terms, listen in to this as well.

Kentucky Derby: New Thread

Well, I’m just finding too many classic greats in honor of the KD, so here are a few more (keep talking and watching below):

[video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htCUUTk6vT4]

These vids are a bit goofy, but better than nothing.

Bob, Alydar. 

[video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65V3xFLPNLA]

Dave, here is Native Dancer, nearly there:

[video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBBvKILL1IM]

Well, if you can take it, here’s Tim’s pick. Bottom line: Ruffian. A figure of unparalleled stature.

[video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZ5m4o21qz0]

Eventually, a winner:

[video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MN7pscnulA]

 

 

 

135th Kentucky Derby: Call for Nominations

In honor of the 135th running of the Kentucky Derby, we are taking nominations for your favorite horse or horses that came close, but never won, the first leg of the Triple Crown.

[video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPs7SNpl1y8 320×265]

My vote is Curlin (in this video winning the Dubai World Cup), a chestnut beauty that I saw up close and personal in Monmouth, N.J. Here’s him winning the 2007 Breeder’s Cup Classic. Chills.

[video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsLOcQYi9ys 320×265]

Updated 5/1/09: Here is Curlin v. Rags to Riches in the Belmont Stakes, which was not only a great race for the ages, but one I forgot to mention I saw in person as well. It was a major dual with both horses showing amazing fight to the wire. Everyone there knew they’d seen an absolutely stupendous race, with the Filly going the distance and Curlin kicking into another gear whenever he was asked. Rags got him by nose, the first Filly to win the Belmont in a 100 years.

[video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URl70KylKZg 320×265]

Please use comments to enter your nominations.

More Derby history is here.

For those of you against horseracing: Here’s where to donate to PETA.